Friday, January 23, 2009

Proposed amendments to Films Act are even more ambiguous

In brief:

Allowed : "Wholly accurate" depictions of "actual" events, persons and situations.
Not Allowed : Fictional films about political events, persons or situations.
Questionable : Documentaries containing ex-political detainees' accounts of mental and physical torture under ISA detentions. Dramas depicting political events, persons and situations.

Allowed : Recordings of events that are held according to the law.
Not Allowed : Recordings of protests, demonstrations, political gatherings or any act deemed to be illegal under the law. Does new law empowers police to arrest video cameramen on site?
Questionable : Recordings of events that may not be deemed illegal at the time of recording, such as this, this and this.

Related:

kill the messenger, we're Singaporeans

Filming an illegal event is… illegal?

Saving jobs, savaging filmmakers

Proposed Films Act Amendments: Silencing Upgraded

My Dear Government, Why Do You Treat Me So?

How to inflict selective amnesia

Amendments to the Films Act

Films Act changes target civil disobedience videos



Changes proposed to Films Act

STRAITS TIMES
January 23, 2009 Friday

A BILL was introduced in Parliament yesterday seeking to exempt certain types of films from an existing ban on 'party political films'.

Under proposed amendments to the Films Act, live film recordings of election rallies, public speeches or processions, as well as anniversary celebration videos by political parties will not be considered as party political films.

But the events being filmed must first be held in accordance with the law.

Other types of films that will pass muster are:

  • Documentaries 'made without any animation and composed wholly of an accurate account depicting actual events, persons and situations';

  • Films made by political parties or election candidates of their manifesto and policies.

    The changes expand the list of films not considered party political films under Section 2(3) of the Act.

    The original list in that section comprises films made solely for the purpose of reporting news, and films made just for the purpose of informing or educating the public on the procedures and polling times for any election or national referendum.

    The changes are in line with the Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts' (Mica) response earlier this month to recommendations made by an advisory council on new media.

    The Advisory Council on the Impact of New Media on Society had recommended lifting the ban on party political films in stages, which the Government accepted.

    The Films Act currently defines a party political film in two ways.

    First, as an advertisement made by or on behalf of any political party in Singapore.

    Second, as a film made by any individual which contains material likely to affect voting in any election or national referendum here, or contains partisan or biased comments on any political matter.

    If amendments to the Act are accepted by Parliament, the Board of Film Censors will be the authority that decides whether a film submitted to it is a party political film.

    Also proposed in the Bill is a new Section 4A which empowers the Mica Minister to establish one or more advisory committees to advise the board in relation to any film.

  • Monday, January 12, 2009

    One Country, Two Systems Part lll


    "The essence of the rule of law is that the law applies to all."
    - Singapore's Attorney General Walter Woon, Straits Times Jan 4, 2009


    One Law For Them


    Over 200 Chinese nationals held a sit-in in front of the Ministry of Manpower building to protest against salary arrears on December 30 2008. They were not arrested. Link here.
    Video here by Ho Choon Hiong (It's not Apocalypse Now but enjoy)

    Another For Them



    Singaporeans Seelan Palay and Chong Kai Xiong were arrested this afternoon in front of the same MOM building for staging a protest in support of Burmese nationals allegedly being forced to leave the country for their pro-democracy activities. They were released four hours later and are now being investigated for alleged criminal trespass. Link here and response by Ministry here.


    One Law For This


    A seven-part documentary, produced by the Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts, which traces the ruling People's Action Party's ride to power on the back of the "Communist Tiger" in pre-independent Singapore. The DVD is freely available in Singapore.


    Another For This

    A still from Zahari's 17 Years, a documentary produced by local filmmaker Martyn See which features a protracted interview with Said Zahari, an ex-journalist accused by the Singapore Government of being a communist and subsequently detained for 17 years without trial. It is currently banned by the Minister of Information, Communications and the Arts for allegedly "undermin[ing] public confidence in the government."

    One Country, Two Systems Part l and Part ll

    Friday, January 09, 2009

    Singapore Goverment still fearful of political films

    A bulletin of what I told CNA and ST about the Government's position on the proposed amendments to the Films Act.
    • That I'm standing by my original position that Section 33 and Section 35 should be repealed unconditionally, completely and immediately.
    • That with the partial lifting, we're no better than where we were in 1998 when the Films Act was amended. It's one step backwards, half-step forward.
    • That I rejected the proposal of an "independent advisory panel" to decide for the rest of the population what is suitable for viewing. A First World Nation who attained self-governance in 1959 should allow its people to decide for themselves. Singaporeans are mature and discerning enough.
    • That when it comes to political expression, I believe in community self-moderation, not Government intervention.
    • That the refusal to decriminalize "party political films" and the reluctance to disclose reasons for banning a film under Section 35 is worrying and shows up an insecure government.
    • That the Government's claim that they are "protecting society" by reserving their right to ban films holds no water. A few hundred thousand people have seen 'Singapore Rebel' and 'Zahari's 17 Years' on the internet. I have not received a single complaint calling for the removal of these films. The only people who objected to the screening of these two films are the Government themselves. Whose interests are they really protecting? Singaporeans' or just Lee Kuan Yew's?

    • That 'Singapore Rebel' was in fact inspired by a documentary shown on CNA in 2003 on the political life of Lee Kuan Yew entitled 'Success Stories'. That 'Zahari's 17 Years' presents a counter-balance to 'Riding The Tiger', a documentary made by CNA and the Government about the PAP's defeat of the "Communist Left." Both 'Success Stories' and 'Riding The Tiger' are openly available in local shops.
    • That the Government has shown that it can act quickly by bailing out ailing foreign financial institutions. No reason why it can't summon the same speed in liberalising political space for its own citizens.
    • That the Government has admitted that they cannot stop people from posting political videos online makes it even more imperative that Section 33 and 35 be repealed unconditionally and completely. Why bother retaining laws that cannot be enforced?
    • That I'm resubmitting 'Singapore Rebel' and 'Zahari's 17 Years'. It's the only way to force the Government to define clearly what constitutes an "objective" and "factual" political film.
    • That I'm embarking on a campaign to highlight other sections of the Films Act which affects and criminalizes everyone in Singapore, not just political filmmakers.


    Films Act to be amended to allow factual party political films

    By Valarie Tan, Channel NewsAsia Posted: 09 January

    SINGAPORE : The Singapore government has accepted 17 out of 26 recommendations made by the Advisory Council on the Impact of New Media Society, or AIMS.

    It agreed with the Council that it should take a phased approach to liberalising the Films Act, instead of repealing it immediately.

    It will amend the Films Act to allow for certain types of party political films, which means that political parties and their candidates will be able to use films for internet election advertising during an election.

    But party political films will have to be factual and objective and not dramatise or present a distorted picture.

    In a news conference on Friday morning, Information, Communications and the Arts Minister Lee Boon Yang said that the government will move to amend the Films Act in the next month or two.

    The government also agreed to set up an independent advisory panel, which will be made up of citizens of high standing and who are non-partisan.

    The panel - to be chaired by a retired Senior District Judge and chairman of the Casino Regulatory Authority, Mr Richard Magnus - will determine whether films are party political films and if they can be aired.

    But the Ministry for Information, Communications and the Arts (MICA) said it will retain its right to ban films, like "Zahari 17 Years", which it feels are against public interest under Section 35 of the Films Act even though they may be readily available on the Internet.

    Under the law, the minister is not obliged to give reasons for the ban.

    Dr Lee said: "We know that it's not possible to block everything in certain situations, but that doesn't mean we should give in, be carried along by the tide. We should still state our position."

    When asked why a different law is applied for political films compared to, say, films with violence and sex, Dr Lee said: "For political films, we're protecting society, because we want to maintain the political debate as a rational objective debate, not one given to emotional outburst, not one based on distorted presentations of issues."

    "There is a danger to allowing such films to be circulated publicly in Singapore. Then, you will actually degrade the level of political debate, and you could bring the debate down to a competition between films," he added.

    But the ministry has agreed to relax the Films Act in phases. Responding to the news, filmmaker Martyn See said: "When the government says 'in phases', then the next thing we have to ask is: When? - next five years, next 10 years, when? The government has shown it can act very quickly. So let's act quickly to liberalise political space for Singaporeans."

    Mr See also said he would re-submit his two previously banned films -"Singapore Rebel" and "Zahari 17 Years" - once the amended Films Act has been passed.

    In terms of e-engagement, the government said it will devote more resources to engage Singaporeans in cyberspace. But to ensure accountability, it will not remove the requirement for political websites to be registered.

    The government will also not respond to Internet criticisms outside government sites like REACH. In response to this, blogger Alex Au said: "Is the government going to say 'no, we're going to ignore them because you didn't come into my room?'

    "The government has to find ways of addressing some of the issues that are raised in other parts of the Internet, even if nobody brings it up within REACH. It could be in the form of a statement within REACH itself that addresses the stuff that is being talked about outside."

    Blogger Gerald Giam told Channel NewsAsia: "By and large, the bloggers who are blogging about social and political issues do want some sort of response. I mean, it's a simple analogy that if I'm talking to you and you ignore me, then how do I feel?"

    Dr Amy Khor, chairman of REACH, said: "For serious-minded citizens who are interested to engage the government on various issues they are concerned (about), one of the appeals of REACH is that when he gets into the website, his views will be heard... and there is likely to be a response.

    "He may be able to get interaction, especially with the relevant ministries and officers. (This could) possibly even lead to a change, with his ideas."

    On the rule prohibiting civil servants from voicing their personal opinions on government policies online, MICA said there will be no change. The ministry said allowing them to do so will compromise trust within the Civil Service.

    The government has also accepted almost all the Council's views on protecting minors.

    ---------------------------------

    "..The dark reaches of the internet."

    Try deciphering this cryptic talk from Dr Lee Boon Yang, Singapore's very well-paid Communications and Information Minister.

    " Individuals may be able to surf the web and pull down the film and watch it, I think it's something we've to accept. But we should not because some individuals can do so, we should allow this film to circulate widely and openly in the Singapore context because there's a difference from giving such films the privilege to circulate freely in Singapore to saying that those who want to watch it well you go to the dark reaches of the Internet, pull it down and watch it."
    Party political films, more new media tools allowed by next election

    Progress, a step at a time

    Other reactions from "the dark reaches of the internet"..

    Singapore government rejects AIMS' key recommendations

    Nobly Oppressive

    Lame response to AIMS recommendations shows how behind times the PAP is

    Films Act: Fate of political documentary films remains unclear

    one step forward, another step back?

    Tuesday, January 06, 2009

    One Nation Under the Films Act




















    Join the campaign to raise awareness about a law that criminalizes everyone in Singapore who has in his or her possession a copy of a film that has not been licensed by the authorities. And this includes video images stored in mobile phones.

    The Films Act is an archaic piece of legislation written in 1981. We are calling for a repeal, or at the very least, a complete review of the statute.

    Click here to join

    ________________________________________

    Sections of the Films Act you should know about

    SECTION 12

    Films made in Singapore to be deposited in approved warehouse
    12. —(1) The owner of any film made in Singapore shall, within 7 days after the making of the film, deposit the film in a warehouse approved for this purpose by the Board.

    (2) Any person who fails to deposit the film in accordance with subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000.


    SECTION 14

    Submission of films for censorship
    14. —(1) Every film in the possession of any person shall be submitted to the Board without any alteration or excision for the purpose of censorship at the owner’s risk and expense and at such time and place as the Board may appoint.

    (2) During the course of censorship, the Board may in its discretion exclude any person from the place where the film is being exhibited.


    SECTION 15

    Prohibition and approval of films for exhibition
    15. —(1) After the submission of a film for the purpose of censorship, the Board may —

    (a) approve the film for exhibition without alteration or excision;

    (b) prohibit the exhibition of the film; or

    (c) approve the film for exhibition with such alterations or excisions as it may require.


    SECTION 21

    Penalty for possession, exhibition or distribution of uncensored films
    21. —(1) Any person who —

    (a) has in his possession;

    (b) exhibits or distributes; or

    (c) reproduces,

    any film without a valid certificate, approving the exhibition of the film, shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —

    (i) in respect of an offence under paragraph (a), to a fine of not less than $100 for each such film that he had in his possession (but not to exceed in the aggregate $20,000); and

    (ii) in respect of an offence under paragraph (b) or (c), to a fine of not less than $500 for each such film he had exhibited, distributed or reproduced, as the case may be (but not to exceed in the aggregate $40,000) or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to both.
    [10/98]


    SECTION 22

    Advertisement of films for exhibition prohibited unless approved by Board
    22. —(1) No person shall advertise or cause to be advertised the exhibition or distribution of any film unless the advertisement has been approved by the Board.

    (2) Any person who advertises or causes to be advertised any film where the advertisement in respect of the film has not been approved by the Board under subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000.


    SECTION 23

    Search for unauthorised films and arrest of persons
    23. —(1) Whenever a Deputy or an Assistant Commissioner of Police or an Assistant Superintendent of Police is satisfied upon written information and after any further inquiry which he may think necessary that any film —

    (a) which has not been —

    (i) deposited in an approved warehouse as required by section 12 or 13;

    (ii) returned to the Board as required by section 14 (4); or

    (iii) approved for exhibition under section 15 or 26 (4);

    (b) in respect of which the certificate issued therefor has ceased to be valid under section 20; or

    (c) which has been altered in any way after a certificate in respect of the film was issued,

    has been or is being exhibited or kept in any place, he may issue a warrant directed to any police officer to enter and search that place and seize the film and to take into custody any person reasonably believed to be guilty of an offence by reason of failure to deposit or to return the film or by reason of such possession or exhibition.
    [10/98]

    (2) A Deputy or an Assistant Commissioner of Police or an Assistant Superintendent of Police may without warrant, with such assistance and by such force as is necessary, by night or by day, himself do what he may authorise any police officer to do under subsection (1) in either of the following cases:

    (a) if he has personal knowledge of such facts as satisfy him that there are sufficient grounds for a search;

    (b) if he receives information orally in such circumstances that the object of a search would in his opinion be defeated by the delay necessary for reducing the information to writing except that the name and address of the person giving the information is known to or ascertained by him before he acts upon the information.


    SECTION 30

    Possession of obscene films
    30. —(1) Any person who has in his possession any obscene film shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine of not less than $500 for each such film he had in his possession (but not to exceed in the aggregate $20,000) or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to both.


    SECTION 33

    Making, distribution and exhibition of party political films
    33. Any person who —

    (a) imports any party political film;

    (b) makes or reproduces any party political film;

    (c) distributes, or has in his possession for the purposes of distributing, to any other person any party political film; or

    (d) exhibits, or has in his possession for the purposes of exhibiting, to any other person any party political film,

    knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the film to be a party political film shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years.


    SECTION 34

    Search and seizure of unlawful films
    34. —(1) Any Deputy or Assistant Commissioner of Police, Assistant Superintendent of Police or any Censor, Deputy or Assistant Censor or Inspector of Films, if satisfied upon written information and after such further inquiry as he thinks necessary that any person has in his possession any obscene film or party political film, may without warrant, with such assistance and by such force as is necessary, by night or by day, enter and search any place where he has reason to believe the film is kept, seize the film and any equipment used in the exhibition, making or reproduction of the film and take into custody any person reasonably believed to be in possession thereof.


    SECTION 35

    Minister may prohibit possession or distribution of any film
    35. —(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of this Act if the Minister is of the opinion that the possession or distribution of any film would be contrary to the public interest, he may, in his discretion, by order published in the Gazette prohibit the possession or distribution of that film by any person.

    (2) Any person who has in his possession or who distributes any film the possession or distribution of which has been prohibited under subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both, and the film shall be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Minister thinks fit.


    SECTION 40

    Exemptions
    40. —(1) This Act shall not apply to —

    (a) any film sponsored by the Government;

    (b) any film, not being an obscene film or a party political film or any feature, commercial, documentary or overseas television serial film, which is made by an individual and is not intended for distribution or public exhibition; and

    (c) any film reproduced from local television programmes and is not intended for distribution or public exhibition.
    [10/98]

    (2) The Minister may, subject to such conditions as he thinks fit, exempt any person or class of persons or any film or class of films from all or any of the provisions of this Act.

    (3) An exemption granted under this section may be withdrawn at any time.

    ________________________________________

    INTERPRETATIONS

    "film" means —

    (a) any cinematograph film;

    (b) any video recording, including a video recording that is designed for use wholly or principally as a game;

    (c) any other material record or thing on which is recorded or stored for immediate or future retrieval any information that, by the use of any computer or electronic device, is capable of being reproduced or displayed as wholly or partly visual moving pictures,

    and includes any part of a film, and any copy or part of a copy of the whole or any part of a film;

    ------------------------------------------


    "obscene" , in relation to a film, means a film the effect of which or (where the film comprises 2 or more distinct parts or items) the effect of any one of its parts or items is, if taken as a whole, such as to tend to deprave or corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances, to see or hear the film;

    -------------------------------------------


    "party political film" means a film —

    (a) which is an advertisement made by or on behalf of any political party in Singapore or any body whose objects relate wholly or mainly to politics in Singapore, or any branch of such party or body; or

    (b) which is made by any person and directed towards any political end in Singapore;

    (2) For the purposes of this Act, a film is directed towards a political end in Singapore if the film —

    (a) contains wholly or partly any matter which is intended or likely to affect voting in any election or national referendum in Singapore; or

    (b) contains wholly or partly either partisan or biased references to or comments on any political matter, including but not limited to any of the following:

    (i) an election or a national referendum in Singapore;

    (ii) a candidate or group of candidates in an election;

    (iii) an issue submitted or otherwise before electors in an election or a national referendum in Singapore;

    (iv) the Government or a previous Government or the opposition to the Government or previous Government;

    (v) a Member of Parliament;

    (vi) a current policy of the Government or an issue of public controversy in Singapore; or

    (vii) a political party in Singapore or any body whose objects relate wholly or mainly to politics in Singapore, or any branch of such party or body.
    [10/98]

    (3) For the avoidance of doubt, any film which is made solely for the purpose of —

    (a) reporting of current events; or

    (b) informing or educating persons on the procedures and polling times for any election or national referendum in Singapore,

    is not a party political film.

    Sunday, November 16, 2008

    Partisan political films please, we're the PAP

    Three years ago, I was placed under police investagation for making Singapore Rebel. I had to surrender all my tapes and camera and was subjected to gruelling interviews by the police - all for making a "party political film", as alleged by the complainant, the Media Development Authority (MDA).

    Some of my friends and acquaintances were also called up by the police for interviews, as the Singapore Gestapo combed through my phone records without my knowledge. I have publicly stated, even to the local press, that I hope to be the first and last person to be formally investigated for making a political film in Singapore.

    Today, I can safely lay claim to that title.

    The ruling People's Action Party will be making and posting their videos on their website. That's great news. But then someone should tell them to submit all their videos to the Board of Film Censors, as required by the Films Act. Otherwise, the censors are not averse to physically seizing films, as they did with One Nation Under Lee. Or are some parties in Singapore more above the law than others?

    For the record, Singapore Rebel and Zahari's 17 Years are still officially banned in Singapore. Possession of any such copies are liable to prosecution. But yes, I do have copies, and I will resubmit both videos to the censors very soon.

    And lest anyone is duped into believing that Singapore is opening up beacuse of the easing of political films, please be reminded that the Act banning such films was passed in 1998. With the latest ruling, we're really no better than we were prior to 1998. It's two steps back, one step forward. Again, if you still need further confirmation, ask him, and them.


    PAP aims to click with young

    Revamped website to feature party's videos in bid to connect with IT-savvy voters
    By Goh Chin Lian
    STRAITS TIMES

    Singaporeans can now go online to watch short videos of People's Action Party (PAP) MPs at events on the party's revamped website that was launched yesterday.

    It is a new way to reach out to young and IT-savvy voters, said party chairman Lim Boon Heng last night.

    'New media is facilitating change. Our party is gearing up our resources to harness this new platform,' he told 1,500 activists and unionists at the PAP's awards ceremony.

    'It will change some of the things that we do at our branches.'

    For instance, at each of the 84 branches, two or three party activists will now report on events, and put up slideshows and video footage on the party website.

    'Since the new media is reaching out to more and more people, not just the young but also some of the older ones who have got into IT, the party should use it as a medium for reaching out to people,' Mr Lim told reporters later.

    His comments follow recent moves to ease the ban on party political videos. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong indicated at this year's National Day Rally that he was in favour of relaxing existing rules.

    A government-appointed advisory council on new media issues is expected to make known its recommendations.

    Once the new rules are clear, Mr Lim said the party will ensure that its branches abide by them. Currently, the videos on its website are more like slideshows.

    Some MPs like Mrs Josephine Teo plan to do more than videos. Her Toa Payoh East branch intends to set up an account on social networking site Facebook for residents to communicate with her and with one another.

    That is because traditional ways of outreach are not as effective with the young.

    Read the rest here.

    Wednesday, October 08, 2008

    "I have lost everything but I have no regrets"



    Oh the foes will rise
    With the sleep in their eyes
    And they'll jerk from their beds and think they're dreamin'
    But they'll pinch themselves and squeal
    And know that it's for real
    The hour that the ship comes in.

    Then they'll raise their hands
    Sayin' we'll meet all your demands
    But we'll shout from the bow your days are numbered
    And like Pharaoh's tribe
    They'll be drownded in the tide
    And like Goliath, they'll be conquered

    Lyrics by Bob Dylan
    Performed by Marcus Carl Franklin


    ****************************************

    An excerpt of the introduction to Make It Right For Singapore

    published in 2000
    by Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam

    I have, as a result of going into politics, lost everything. I have no bank account to speak of and do not own any property in Singapore nor hold any stocks or shares in any company. My practice has suffered as a result of my entering into politics way back in 1971. I drive a car but it is one that my son has lent me. I count it as the Grace of providence that I have not been detained and made to spend long years in prison like Mr Chia Thia Poh who spent 23 years in prison and often in solitary confinement.

    This book is my humble presentation to the people who in any democratic society are the final judges of what is good for the society they live in. The speeches have one constant theme running through them. That in any democratic society it is the members of the society - the people - who matter.

    That they should determine collectively the good of the society and not have it determined for them by anyone above them, however benevolent.

    That the society as a whole should take responsibility for its affairs and participate in the making of decisions that affect them.

    That power belongs to the people and the government only exercises powers delegated to it by the people.

    That the people are the masters and not the government which is only a servant of the people.

    That if this does not obtain in any society it ceases to be a democratic society and the people are reduced to being slaves in their own country. Slaves have no say in what their master ordains for them.

    It follows that in every democratic society, the individual matters, however lowly he may be. The dustman is as much entitled to his dignity and the rights to preserve that dignity as the highest person in the land is.

    These rights which have been termed human rights are inalienable and no person should be deprived of them even in the supposed interest of the community. It is a blot on the community even if one person is deprived of his rights.

    It is only by protecting the rights of every single individual that the community as a whole is protected.

    The rights are those that are necessary to the full development of the individual's dignity as a human being.

    The rights to housing, education, medical care, food and clothing. Besides these material rights, are those inalienable rights but no less important. The right to liberty, freedom from arbitrary arrest, to think, to speak his mind, to associate with his fellow beings in speaking together, to move freely and the right to live his life without fear under the law.

    To know what the law to which he has agreed through his elected representatives prohibits him from doing and to live his life fully without transgressing the law. That he can only be deprived of any of his rights after it has been proven to him that he had broken his contract with his fellow members of society.

    Deprive a human being of these inalienable rights and you make him less than a human being however well off he may be materially.

    A person loses his dignity if he is not allowed to think and give utterance to his thoughts whether alone or in the company of others. I am a passionate believer in all these. We are at the highest level of creation when we have taken on the image of God.

    The speeches scan the period from June 1997 to November 1999. Although a full Parliament was in place in January, Parliament did not meet until the end of May. The government functioned without Parliament. In a parliamentary democracy government takes its authority from Parliament but in Singapore the government was constituted and exercised power before Parliament was sworn in. This was also the position after the 1988 and 1991 elections..

    The right to justice is an integral part of human rights. Indeed it is justice that protects and safeguards human rights. I am concerned at some unhealthy trends in Singapore in the administration of criminal justice - the part of justice which protects human liberty and freedom. It is a concern that many lawyers in Singapore share.

    It is my hope that Singaporeans may find some inspiration in my speeches. Although, as I said, I have lost everything. I have no regrets.

    My reward has been the esteem I have met everywhere I go in Singapore and that is something no amount of money can buy.

    I thank God that he has given me the health and strength to render such service as I have tried to from 1971.

    - J.B. Jeyaretnam (1926 - 2008)

    Tuesday, September 30, 2008

    JB Jeyaretnam - Singapore's Martyr

    At the funeral parlour this afternoon, Kenneth Jeyaretnam related to us how despite warnings from doctors about his father's heart condition, JBJ kept putting off medical treatment until such a time when he could finish his immediate task.

    And what was this task that was so urgent? He had been toiling in court to bring the Singapore Government to bear for not holding a by-election after a PAP MP had passed away recently.

    He didn't have to do this, nor did he have to form a new political party, or to revive his law practice. At the age of 82, he should have long retired, as both of his sons are successful professionals.

    Even to his last day, he battled for justice, for accountability, for a free Singapore. He gave away his life, literally, to the pursuit of genuine democracy in Singapore.

    Martyn See Tong Ming
    1 Oct 2008


    Monday, September 15, 2008

    Short film on elderly poor rated NC16

    Nation Builders, a 14 minute documentary featuring scenes of the elderly poor ekeing out a living in Singapore, has been rated NC16 by the Board of Film Censors. I had submitted the film in July and it was cleared by the censors last week. No mention is made in the certificate (YN03947004) on why the film has been deemed unsuitable for viewers under the age of 16. A fee of $10.80 is payable upon every film you submit to the censors (even though the Films Act requires ALL films to be authorised by the BFC). I was told to write in to the Board to request for an explanation for the rating.

    Watch the entire video here and form your own conclusions as to why the Singapore Government does not want their under 16s to watch this film in a public screening.

    And oh , read this too.
    From hospital, Lee Kuan Yew asks rich to help poor
    "Unlike Kim Jong Il who says he is well but has not appeared, I thought I'd better say hello to you and to your guests and apologise for not being able to join you." - MM Lee Kuan Yew



    The censors' clearance of Nation Builders follows the approval of six other films, made by director Ho Choon Hiong, which documented a recent spate of political protests in Singapore.

    They are rated as follows.

    1. Human rights torch relay by Falungong in Singapore (M18)
    Youtube link here
    Related article : Singapore Welcomes the Global Human Rights Torch Relay

    2. BURMESE SAYS NO. (NC16)

    Youtube link here
    Related article : Myanmar nationals protest constitution in Singapore

    3. Burmese staged peaceful demonstration in Singapore (PG)
    Youtube link here.
    Related article : Activists Defy Protest Ban At ASEAN Summit In Singapore

    4. NUS international students Vigil Walk (PG)
    Youtube link here
    Related article : Protest Singapore Style; 3 Marchers, 19 Media, 1000 Police

    5. Singaporean started 5 days fasting against ISA on Hindraf 5 (PG)
    Youtube link here
    Related article : Palay ends hunger strike for Hindraf five

    6. Morning May day Montage (PG)
    Youtube link here
    Related article : Report on SDP's Walking for Workers

    Six short political films first passed by Singapore censors

    Singapore - Six short films documenting political activities in Singapore have been approved by Singapore censors, the first since the easing of an outright ban last month, media reports said on Saturday. The films produced by Ho Choon Hiong, 33, focus on street demonstrations, protests and fasting.

    "It is an encouraging sign," The Straights Times quoted Ho as saying of the Board of Film Censors (BFC) nod.

    Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said last month that the ban could be relaxed. He said during the National Day Rally address that factual footage, documentaries and recordings of live events would be okayed.

    Still off-limits are the making or distribution of party political films, including ads by parties or other political organizations or footage distorted to create a slanted impression.

    Among the topics of films that received the go-ahead are a protest against the Beijing Olympics by members of the Falungong sect in the city-state, protests by Myanmar nationals and a Singaporean fasting outside the Malaysian High Commission in protest against the detention of Malaysian Hindu rights activists, the report said.

    Tuesday, September 09, 2008

    Political films across the causeway


    Malaysia's premier showcase of human rights films will travel to Johor Bahru this weekend. It will be the closest location by which Singaporeans can watch One Nation Under Lee in a public space. Director Seelan Palay will be present at the post-screening Q&A session.

    Venue : Tropical Inn
    Address : 15, Jalan Gereja, Johor Bahru
    Dates : 12 to 14 Sept 2008
    Time : 11am til 10pm
    Admission is FREE


    One Nation Under Lee will screen on Saturday at 4.30pm.

    Other highlights include :

    War on Democracy : John Pilger's latest film uses CIA files and archive footage to demonstrate how the United States had undermined democracy in Latin America, replacing them with dictators such as Chile's General Pinochet.

    Promised Paradise : Jakarta-based puppeteer and troubadour Agus Nur Amal travels to Bali to call to account the people who were responsible for the bomb attack on a nightclub there on 12 October 2002. This film is officially banned in Indonesia, but shown to rapturous appluase at last week's screening in Kuala Lumpur.

    A Human Request : When the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted I December 1948, eight states abstained form voting arguing that certain articles were not acceptable in their cultures.

    Pecah Lobang : Pecah Lobang explores what it’s like to be a Muslim transsexual sex worker in Malaysia. Crossdressing is a crime under the Syariah court system for Muslims and the penalties are severe. But it wasn’t always so. A finalist of FFF's award.

    Pilihanraya Umum Malaysia ke-12 : Is elections in Malaysia free and fair? This documentary makes the case that citizens need to be educated on their voting rights. A finalist of FFF's award.

    Who Speaks for Me? : This documentary explores the issue of free expression in Malaysia in the aftermath of local rapper Namewee's controversial Negaraku-ku video. Winner of this year's FFF's "Most Outstanding Human Rights Film". Watch the interview of the three finalists here.

    Queer Cinema : Three films exploring homosexual relationships, including Amir Muhammad's Pang Yau.

    Click here for complete list of films and schedules.

    Pro-govt press interviews renegade filmmakers

    The interview below was conducted some two months ago, before the recent announcement by PM Lee on relaxing the ban on political films. What was Straits Times' hidden agenda? Perhaps it's a way to profile us for the Internal Security Department dossiers. Perhaps ST has vested interest to see political films relaxed for their own RazorTV. Perhaps they want to score some brownies in international press freedom rankings. Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps. Oh, whatever.


    Film-makers on the fringe

    Before the PM announced recently that the ban on political films was likely to be eased, they were already documenting scenes of S'pore politics and producing controversial films that flirted with the law. Meet the intrepid trio who believe they are rebels with a cause. -ST

    Sun, Sep 07, 2008
    The Straits Times

    By Sue-Ann Chia, political correspondent


    WHEN the death knell sounded on a 10-year-old law that imposes a total ban on political films two weeks ago, film-maker Martyn See cheered.

    The move marked the biggest effort in 20 years by the Government to loosen its hold on political expression here, declared the 39-year-old.

    As a mischievous tribute, he pulled together 100 films on local politics, compiling them on his blog a week after Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in his Aug 17 National Day Rally speech that an outright ban on political films was no longer sensible.

    The 100 short clips - 'films' is too formal a term to describe them - are the work of assorted groups and individuals, most with a decidedly anti-establishment stance.

    They include two by Mr See which did not make the censor's cut. One is on Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan and the other on former political detainee Said Zahari.

    He plans to re-submit them to the Board of Film Censors once the ban on political films is formally eased - likely early next year - just to test the new system.

    He wants to do so because the prospective change comes with caveats: Films which are partisan or give a distorted and slanted impression will still be off-limits.

    His own view is that there should be no caveats. 'If it is not sheer stupidity to continue enforcing bans on these films when they can be viewed at a click of a mouse, I don't know what is,' he wrote on his blog.

    How did he come to be such a fighter against Section 33 of the Films Act, which bans party political films?

    Political awakening

    ATTRIBUTE it to a second political awakening that came in the wake of the 2001 general election.

    He had had a first awakening back in the mid-1990s, when a photocopy of a banned book came his way.

    The book was To Catch A Tartar, written by former solicitor-general Francis Seow, describing his detention under the Internal Security Act in the late 1980s.

    'My eyes were opened to the darker side of the PAP's history,' he says.

    'I read it from cover to cover. I felt...frightened, depressed and angry at the same time.'

    His hitherto placid political outlook changed then, but it was only later - after the November 2001 election - that he was really roused into action.

    What caught his attention was Dr Chee Soon Juan heckling then prime minister Goh Chok Tong about an alleged loan to former Indonesian president Suharto.

    'Chee Soon Juan got hammered very badly. I wondered, is this guy as bad as the media made him out to be? So I decided to check him out myself,' he says.

    A few months later, in 2002, he asked to meet Dr Chee.

    For the next two years, he 'interviewed' the SDP leader regularly, visited him at his home and his office, and observed him when he staged public protests - filming all the while.

    He had reams of footage but no film, until Mr Lee Hsien Loong was sworn in as Prime Minister in 2004.

    Mr Lee's inauguration speech, promising the opening up of civil society, inspired him to compile his shots into a 28-minute film which he titled Singapore Rebel.

    He submitted it for screening at a film festival. But the film never made it past the censors.

    It was deemed 'party political', and banned under Section 33 of the Films Act.

    He was questioned four times over 15 months by the police and even had his video camera seized.

    'They dropped the investigation a couple of months after the 2006 general election. I guess they wanted to watch if I would participate in the election,' he says.

    He never did. But he continued to produce politically incorrect films.

    Singapore Rebel

    MR SEE titled his directorial debut Singapore Rebel. Although about Dr Chee, it sums up Mr See himself - someone bent on capturing alternative politics on celluloid.

    He began his film-making career nearly 20 years ago, right after national service, learning the ropes of video editing in production houses. Along the way, he became a freelance video editor, working for renowned local directors such as Mr Eric Khoo and Mr Jack Neo.

    He spends 90 per cent of his time doing such work to 'pay the bills', but the remaining 10 per cent is now consumed by his passion - making films on local political issues.

    While being questioned by the police over Singapore Rebel, he produced another film, on former political detainee Said Zahari. This was also banned.

    His latest, on Dr Chee and the protests he staged during the IMF-World Bank meetings in 2006, however made the cut. Speakers' Cornered was given an NC-16 rating and screened at the Substation on July 26 this year.

    Despite the overwhelmingly pro-opposition - especially pro-SDP - angles in his films, he insists he is not an opposition supporter or sympathiser.

    He says: 'I fill a vacuum created by the media when they don't cover opposition politicians or political dissidents. I consider myself a citizen journalist, not a Michael Moore type of film-maker.'

    Asked why he bothers to submit his films for classification when he can upload them on YouTube, he deadpans that the law requires it.

    The more compelling reason is that he wants to push the envelope in the area of political expression.

    'Who better to do that than me,' he says, 'since I'm already over the OB markers. I want more film-makers who want to document the political scenes to emerge.'

    In this, he has found a following of sorts.

    Mr Ho Choon Hiong, 33, first heard about Mr See when Singapore Rebel was banned three years ago.

    He was among a group of 12 film-makers who wrote to the Government then, asking for greater clarity as to what constituted a party political film.

    The incident led to him meeting Mr See.

    Their subsequent exchanges emboldened him to capture on celluloid assorted scenes of political activism in Singapore.

    Unlike Mr See, he was introduced to politics early by his father, who used to be a student activist at Chinese High School in the 1960s.

    Like Mr See, however, his political interest was stoked by the 2001 polls and Dr Chee.

    After meeting Mr See, he produced a plethora of very short films, on topics ranging from the 2006 election to protests by Myanmar nationals in Singapore. He sent six to the film censors for classification in May.

    'I have to take a few steps and hope to be undeterred more and more,' says the film studies graduate from Ngee Ann Polytechnic.

    'I want to put my own perception of truth out.'

    So far, his 'films' have been ignored by the authorities.

    A prolific activist

    NOT so for Mr Seelan Palay, 24, another amateur film-maker.

    He had his film, One Nation Under Lee, seized by officials from the Board of Film Censors as it was being screened in a hotel recently.

    The reason: It had not been passed by the censors.

    His first effort - detractors panned it as a slide show rather than a film - it portrayed Singapore as lacking in press and political freedom, and tightly controlled by Mr Lee Kuan Yew.

    Point out that One Nation Under Lee is decidedly one-sided - it takes potshots at the Government while hailing Dr Chee as a hero - and he insists he has no political agenda.

    He isn't politicised by anyone either, he insists.

    'I learnt everything from reading, out of personal interest,' says the activist.

    CITIZEN JOURNALIST

    'I fill a vacuum created by the media when they don't cover opposition politicians or political dissidents. I consider myself a citizen journalist, not a Michael Moore type of film-maker.'
    -- Film-maker Martyn See


    He has been involved at various times with the Vegetarian Society, the Animal Concerns Research & Education Society, and the now defunct SG Human Rights Group.

    Earlier this year he attended rallies by Hindu protesters in Kuala Lumpur, and upon his return to Singapore, decided to mount a one-man protest fast outside the Malaysian High Commission.

    He also takes part in protest actions organised by the SDP occasionally.

    He is not a troublemaker, he insists. He is just doing what he believes in.

    Nothing to fear

    WHAT keeps the trio going?

    'Our conscience pricks us,' says Mr Ho. He sees it as his duty to document what he believes gets sidelined by the mainstream media.

    The trio use the same counter when you point out that their version of 'truth' sometimes takes an extreme slant. Others have noted that it was the publicity over the banning of some of their films, rather than the quality of the films themselves, that made the public more keen to view them.

    But they are not perturbed.

    For Mr See, his mission is simple.

    'I live by the Singapore Pledge. I live by the Constitution that guarantees freedom of expression, association and assembly,' he says.

    And he aims to guard these freedoms by showing that there is nothing to fear.

    The other two, less articulate about their aims, appear to go with the flow as acolytes of Mr See, enjoying the thrill of defiance every once in a while.

    They are all drawn to Dr Chee, whom they see as championing freedom of expression and provoking the Government with his illegal public protests.

    Still, they say, they have no intention of joining the SDP or any political party. Ironically, they fear being hemmed in by party discipline.

    Mr Palay, for instance, will tell you that he supports the SDP's cause but has no wish to sign on as a member.

    Have they made an impact on the political scene? They believe so, pointing to more local film-makers who remain anonymous but, like them, upload political-type films on YouTube.

    They also claim some credit for the Government's decision to consider lifting the ban on political films.

    It was, they say, the banning of Mr See's Singapore Rebel that sparked a debate on the relevance of the Films Act.

    Future films

    FOR now, the three men have film ideas that they hope will see the light of day.

    Mr Palay wants to do a film on the unspoken rule limiting use of dialects in films.

    Mr Ho is aiming to do documentaries on two women: Dr Chee's wife, and his own long-lost Malaysian nanny whom he is still trying to locate.

    As for Mr See, he has two targets too. One is the reclusive former political detainee Chia Thye Poh. The other is Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew.

    In the latter film, he wants to trace the People's Action Party's formation and rise to the pinnacle of power in Singapore.

    Why do a film on the PAP when its story has been told so many times before? 'It is a compelling story,' he says.

    So are they really rebels with a cause?

    Says Mr See: 'There's definitely a purpose to what we're doing. I see it as lessening the climate of fear here.

    'I want more film-makers like me to emerge, wanting to document the political scenes in Singapore.'

    This article was first published in The Straits Times on Sep 5, 2008.

    Saturday, August 23, 2008

    Top 100 Political Videos (that are likely to be banned in Singapore)

    UPDATED 30 MARCH 2009

    The following videos are arbitrarily ranked according to their strength of message and likelihood of being banned by the Singapore censors. The list will be continually updated.

    Also visit Singapore Viewer for more videos

    _____________________________________________________________________________

    1. One Nation Under Lee 2008
    2. The Maid Trade - Singapore 2008
    3. Zahari's 17 Years 2007
    4. Anti-death penalty forum 2005
    5. Hitler And ERP Woes (Singapore) 2008
    6. Hitler Slams Failed Investment 2009
    7. Miserables In Singapore 2009
    8. Dr Chee Soon Juan's Message to President Obama 2009
    9. NS Song 2007
    10. Singapore bans "Zahari's 17 Years" 2007

    11. Singapore - Time For Change 2008
    12. Lee Kuan Yew: World-renowned statesman and race realist 2008
    13. Malay and Proud of It.. 2007
    14. Money No Enough 3 2008
    13. Riot police vs four silent protesters in Singapore 2006
    14. Singapore Police Abduction (Part 1) and (Part 2) 2007
    15. Censors seize film One Nation Under Lee, Part 1 and Part 2
    16. Message of defiance from Singapore activists 2007
    17. Singapore Rebel 2005
    18. Nation Builders 2007
    19. Singapore - Broken Promises 2008
    20. NS for Singaporeans, Jobs & Scholarships for Foreigners 2008

    21. Fixing The Opposition 2008
    22. Rebels With A Faith - Singapore 2008
    23. Shine for Singapore Song 晴空万里 2008
    24. Said Zahari's book launch 2007
    25. Poor in singapore can't afford food 2008
    26. SDP Consumer Day protest - the Arrival, the Protest, the Arrest, part 2 2008
    27. The Police State 2008
    28. SDP World Consumer Rights Day March and Protest Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 2008
    29. Singapore - Stand up for change 2008
    30. PAP is the enemy - know your enemy 2007

    31. Charged for speaking in public without a permit 2007
    32. CSJ on Minister Pay Hike Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 2007
    33. A Singaporean Singapore 2008
    34. Burmese staged peaceful demonstration in Singapore 2007
    35. Free Burma, Free Singapore 2007
    36. Protest Outside Burmese Embassy in Singapore 2007
    37. Petition-signing at Burmese embassy in Singapore 2007
    38. Lee Kuan Yew 2007
    39. SDP members arrested outside the Istana, Singapore 2007

    40. Singapore Police video-taping protestors at Burma Embassy 2007
    41. Kudos to Lee Kuan Yew, for finally succeeding in making a little girl cry! 2008
    42. The Shameless LIAR- IBA letter & Report - LKY 2008
    43. "Loong Loong And His Loyal Dog" 2008
    44. Cowards - the father - LKY 2008
    45. Cowards - the son - LHL 2008
    46. Dick Lee sings We Are Singapore! 2007
    47. Chee Soon Juan's WFDA address 2007
    48. Chee Soon Juan addresses SDP cadres Part 1 and Part 2 2007
    49. This Old Man 2007
    50. The Mas Selamat Story 2008

    51. Human Rights Day: Singapore Lawyers petition to Law Society 2007
    52. Singapore's extraordinary government 2007
    53. Homeless and poor in Singapore 2007
    54. The Singapore government welcomes you to emigrate to Singapore to replace its rebellious locals! 2008
    55. Flame of Democracy 2007
    56. Is Chee Soon Juan A Psychopath Or Freedom Fighter? 2008
    57. Capital punishment in Singapore 2008
    58. REPEAL 377A SINGAPORE! 2007
    59. Banned Conference In Singapore: Part 1 and Part 2 2007
    60. SDP Election Reform Forum (Dr Chee) - Part 1, 2, 3 2008

    61. Mas Selamat Kastari - Toilet escape Video. 2008
    62. Mee Siam Mai Hum MTV 2006
    63. Lee Kuan Yew's PAP will be remembered forever! 人民行动党 - 百世留名! 2008
    64. SGHR celebrates Human Rights Day at speakers corner 2007
    65. The Importance of Being Elite 2006
    66. The Chees vs The Lees 2008
    67. SG Human Rights petition for Burma to ASEAN 2007
    68. BURMESE SAYS NO 2008
    69. WE LIVE IN SINGAPURA the MTV version 2006
    70. CSJ's Message From Prison 2006

    71. Singapore General Election 2009 新加坡大选: BERUBAH 改变 மாற்றம் CHANGE 2009
    72. Chee Soon Juan prison release 2007
    73. Chee Soon Juan's Release from Prison, June 2008 2008
    74. NUS International Students Vigil Walk 2007
    75. Betrayal (The First Chapter of a Notorious Singapore Book) 2008
    76. Chee Soon Juan at SDP rally 5th May Part 1 2006
    77. Dr Chee at Rally 2006 Woodlands 2006
    78. 搬金八辆 (Moving 8 Lorry-loads of Gold) 2008
    79. Seelan Palay's 5 Day hunger strike, part 1, part 2, montage 2008
    80. Human Rights Torch Relay in Singapore 2008

    81. SDP Tak Boleh Tahan Campaign! May Day, Interviews Part 1 , Part 2 , Part 3 , Part 4 2008
    82. SDP's Tak Boleh Tahan Event Toa Payoh Lorong 1 2008
    83. Tak Boleh Tahan press statement by Chia Ti Lik 2008
    84. Umbrella at policemen / George Bush in NUS 2007
    85. Tribute Video To Mr. JBJ - True Singapore Hero 2007
    86. Reform Party Inauguration Dinner, Opposition show of unity, Speech 2008
    87. Burmese in Myanmar Embassy in Singapore Song, Part 1, Part 2 2008
    88. The Singapore Shame 2008
    89. May Day Message from SDP Chair 2008
    90. Kawanku by Namewee 2007

    91. A video in support of Singapore's Ministry of Education (MOE)'s Civics and Moral Education (CME) and National Education (NE) curriculum 2008
    92. Handphone-shot election rally videos 2006
    93. Workers' Party 50th Anniversary/GE 2006 2007
    94. Burma On My Mind - Human Rights Day 2007
    95. SG IMF - Democracy's "愛拼才會贏" 2006
    96. Ong Kah Chua 王家财(译音)主演的新加坡版《黄飞鸿》 2009
    97. Por Lan Par 捧卵葩 Carry "balls" 呵脬捧卵 2009
    98. 刺青 Spider Lilies - Anti-Gay Hate Speech by Singapore's PAP Minister and Nominated MP 2008
    99. SDP 916 march anniversary 2007
    100. JBJ forms Reform Party Part 1 and Part 2, Q&A, Part 1 and Part 2 2008

    Tuesday, August 19, 2008

    Oops, we were too restrictive : PM Lee

    PM Lee filming the audience in the auditorium with a mobile phone. The candid camera moment held a serious point - anyone can now be an amateur film-maker. -- ST


    'The overall thrust of all these changes is to liberalise our society, to widen the space for expression and participation. We encourage more citizens to engage in debate, to participate in building our shared future. And we will progressively open up our system even more.'
    - PM Lee Hsien Loong, National Day Rally speech 2008




    In his annual National Day rally speech last night, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced a triad of policy changes aimed at loosening up political space in Singapore. Firstly, public demonstrations and protests will be allowed at Speakers' Corner in Hong Lim Park. Secondly, political podcasts and videocasts will be allowed during General Elections. Thirdly, the law banning political films will be partially lifted. For political films, he outlined it like this - "partisan stuff" and "slanted" videos remain outlawed, while "factual footage, documentaries and recordings of live events" will be allowed. In other words, videos such as this may still be illegal while this may get the green light. Others such as this, this and this will fall in the grey zones.

    In anticipation of the PM's announcements, the Straits Times rang me up yesterday to seek my views. I told them that I fully welcome the changes, that it was the biggest stride taken by the Government to loosen up political expression in the last 20 years (including the opening up of Speakers' Corner in 1999 and the waiving of police permits for indoor functions in 2004), that it was step in the right direction in meeting my dual objectives - lessening the climate of fear and a total review of the Films Act, and that the changes were brought about by the recent actions of activists and filmmakers who had pushed the envelope.

    The ST journalist also told me that some of those interviewed before me remained skeptical about such promises. I assume that many will adopt a wait-and-see attitude, and that others will speculate about the hidden traps. I shall not waste time mulling over either. Since the debate over the Films Act began with my film Singapore Rebel, I will seek to end it by re-submitting Rebel and Zahari's 17 Years, both officially banned, to the censors for re-appraisal. If it is not sheer stupidity to continue enforcing bans on these films when they are viewable at a click of a mouse, I don't know what is.


    ______________________________________________


    Yes to factual footage
    By Sue-Ann Chia & Jeremy Au Yong

    MIDWAY through his National Day Rally address, the Prime Minister fished out a mobile phone and proceeded to film the audience before him in the auditorium.

    Behind him, on a giant screen, the audience saw themselves featured on the web page of the Prime Minister's Office - live.

    'There you are, simple as that. I've just made our first non-political video,' he said to laughter from the audience.

    Mr Lee's candid camera moment held a serious point. Anyone can now be an amateur film-maker, capturing politics on film, and people will do so.

    'So, we've got to allow political videos but with some safeguards,' he said. 'An outright ban is no longer sensible.'

    Thanks to new media technologies, people can easily make videos and upload them on the Internet.

    'This is how people communicate on the Web in daily life. They make videos, they pass clips around,' Mr Lee said in his National Day Rally speech on Sunday.

    What will now make the cut with the censors: factual footage, documentaries and recordings of live events.

    But some things still won't pass. 'If you make a political commercial so that it's purely made-up material, partisan stuff, footage distorted to create a slanted impression, I think those should still be off-limits,' he said.

    'In between what is ok and what is not ok, there will be grey areas. But I think we can deal with this.'

    Political films will be dealt with in ways similar to non-political films, with censorship and film classification standards, he said, with a panel to decide whether or not a political film would pass.

    'The overriding consideration is to preserve the integrity, quality, and honesty of our political discourse,' he said.

    Political films were banned 10 years ago, two years after Singapore Democratic Party chief Chee Soon Juan applied for a licence to sell a video-tape on the SDP.

    Section 33 of the Films Act disallows the making, reproduction, distribution and screening of 'party political films'. Such films are defined as those favouring a political party or pushing a political end.

    Mr Lee said political films were banned for a reason.

    'Politics is a serious affair. We want voters to consider issues rationally, coolly...and think through decisions which affect your future and make a considered judgement,' he said.

    'And our worry is that films are an emotive medium. The impact of seeing something on a film is quite different from reading something in cold print.

    'It hits you viscerally. It engages your emotions before your thinking processes can kick in, and if you are watching it in a crowd, (it is) even more powerful.

    'Then, passions can get stirred up and people can get carried away.'

    The promise of some political films being allowed was cheered by film-maker Martyn See, who had two of his films banned in recent years.

    'This is by far the most obvious relaxation of political space in Singapore in the past 20 years. It will lessen the climate of fear,' he said.

    But Senior Research Fellow Tan Tarn How from the Institute of Policy Studies preferred there to be no conditions imposed.

    'It doesn't make sense to assume that most people are most of the time not smart enough to tell the good from the bad, and truth from falsehood,' he said.

    Still, film-maker Tan Pin Pin is happy with the progress.

    'A gesture has been made, and I guess it's a positive thing. This is the start of a long journey, towards less frenetic governance,' she said.

    ---------------------------------

    BETTER ENGAGEMENT

    'PAP welcomes the liberalisation announced by the Prime Minister. This will increase the opportunities for Singaporeans to give their views and allow political parties to better engage cyber-citizens. PAP will operate responsibly within the new and expanded boundaries to inform, educate and reach out to younger voters through various platforms. Overall, our goal is to create a conducive environment, whether online or within the general public, for political issues to be discussed seriously and productively, to help find solutions for challenges that Singapore faces.'

    - Education Minister Ng Eng Hen, PAP organising secretary (special duties and new media)

    NO FAVOUR GRANTED, JUST A RIGHT

    'The Prime Minister is hoping that Singaporeans will go on their bended knees to thank him for these concessions. He seems to forget that the right to make political films or the right to hold demonstrations are part and parcel of human rights.'

    - JB Jeyaretnam, Reform Party


    Read also :

    Political videos on Net?

    Speakers' Corner: protests ok

    Singapore to ease bans on political films

    Singapore To Allow More Freedom Of Expresion

    Singapore PM says ban on outdoor protests should ease

    Friday, August 15, 2008

    One Nation Under Lee to premiere in Malaysia

    One Nation Under Lee, seized by Singapore censors during a private screening this year, will make its official premiere in Malaysia's Freedom Film Festival in Kuala Lumpur. Directed by local artist/activist Seelan Palay, the 45 minute documentary will then proceed to make its rounds in Johor, Sarawak and Penang. Three months after its seizure, the Board of Film Censors has yet to certify the film, which means it is effectively prohibited from public screening in Singapore.

    Previous Singaporean works screened in FFF included Martyn See's Singapore Rebel, Zahari's 17 Years and Speakers Cornered, Tan Pin Pin's Singapore Gaga and Moving House, and Asia Witness Production's I Love Malaya.

    Film : One Nation Under Lee
    Dir : Seelan Palay
    Date : Saturday 6 Sept 2008
    Time : 4.30 pm
    Venue : Central Market Annexe, Kuala Lumpur

    Click here for the full program of Freedom Film Festival.

    Sunday, August 03, 2008

    Democracy, Justice, Equality, Peace, Progress



    Choice quotes from Singapore's political leaders.

    On DEMOCRACY

    "If you believe in democracy, you must believe in it unconditionally. If you believe that men should be free, then, they should have the right of free association, of free speech, of free publication. Then, no law should permit those democratic processes to be set at nought."
    - Lee Kuan Yew as an opposition leader, April 27, 1955


    "If we are to survive as a free democracy, then we must be prepared, in principle, to concede to our enemies - even those who do not subscribe to our views - as much constitutional rights as you concede yourself."
    - Opposition leader Lee Kuan Yew, Legislative Assembly Debates, Sept 21, 1955


    "Anybody who decides to take me on needs to put on knuckle-dusters. If you think you can hurt me more than I can hurt you, try. There is no way you can govern a Chinese society."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, The Man and His Ideas, 1997


    "If I were in authority in Singapore indefinitely without having to ask those who are governed whether they like what is being done, then I would not have the slightest doubt that I could govern much more effectively in their interests." - Lee Kuan Yew, 1962


    "You're talking about Rwanda or Bangladesh, or Cambodia, or the Philippines. They've got democracy, according to Freedom House. But have you got a civilised life to lead? People want economic development first and foremost. The leaders may talk something else. You take a poll of any people. What is it they want? The right to write an editorial as you like? They want homes, medicine, jobs, schools."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, The Man and His Ideas, 1997


    "What are our priorities? First, the welfare, the survival of the people. Then, democratic norms and processes which from time to time we have to suspend."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, 1986 National Day Rally


    "There is nothing to forbid anybody from nailing his colours to the mast, and indeed it is the safest way to do it. Nail your colours to the mast, defend it and say,"This is my flag, this is what I believe in. I believe in open debate, arguments, persuasion, I hope to win by votes." But start manipulating innocent professional groups, cultural groups and make them support political causes, whether its freedom of the foreign press or whatever, then I say you are looking for unpleasant linkages with what has happened in the past."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, 1990 National Day Rally


    "The People's Association is a government organisation to promote government policies."
    - Wong Kan Seng, Straits Times, Mar 22 2003


    "I make no apologies that the PAP is the Government and the Government is the PAP."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, Petir, 1982


    "The ideas of individual supremacy and the right of free expression, when carried to excess, have not worked. They have made it difficult to keep America society cohesive. Asia can see it is not working.. In America itself, there is widespread crime and violence, old people feel forgotten, families are falling apart. And the media attacks the integrity and character of your leaders with impunity, drags down all those in authority and blames everyone but itself."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, Sept 1995


    "For Singapore, its test for its own democracy must be whether it fit and serve the interests of its people and conditions, and not serve some abstract ideal that the Western media thought it ought to conform to. If in 10 years, Philippines, Taiwan and Korea were better societies because they adopted the US model, Singapore would hurry to catch."
    - Goh Chok Tong, 1995 National Day Rally


    "Political reform need not go hand in hand with economic liberalisation.. I hold unconventional views about this.. I do not believe if you are a libertarian, full of diverse opinions, full of competing ideas in the market place, full of sound and fury, therefore you will succeed."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, 2005


    "I think in Singapore, we stand a chance of making the one-man-one-vote system work. With amendments as we have done, you know, like GRCs.. We need to make it work. And I believe with pragmatic adjustments, given these favourable conditions, we can have more open debate."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, 1990 National Day Rally


    "One-man-one-vote is a most difficult form of government.. Results can be erratic."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, Dec 19 1984


    "I'm not intellectually convinced that one-man-one-vote is the best. We practise it because that's what the British bequeathed us."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, 1994


    "There is nothing to prevent you from pushing your propaganda, to push your programme out to the students or with the public at large...and if you can carry the ground, if you are right, you win. That's democracy."
    - Lee Kuan Yew telling students to form political parties, Straits Times, Feb 1, 2005


    "If you are a troublemaker...it's our job to politically destroy you. Put it this way. As long as JB Jeyaretnam stands for what he stands for - a thoroughly destructive force - we will knock him. Everybody knows that in my bag I have a hatchet, and a very sharp one. You take me on, I take my hatchet, we meet in the cul-de-sac."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, The Man And His Ideas, 1997


    "I feel sanguine enough to say that there has never been a better set of conditions for open democratic politics because there is no need for unified front politics."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, 1990 National Day Rally


    "If we had considered them serious political figures, we would not have kept them politically alive for so long. We could have bankrupt them earlier."
    - Lee Kuan Yew on political opposition, Straits Times, Sept 14 2003


    "Once in a while, Think Centre says they want to go to the Speakers' Corner and they want to plant 100 flowers there, let the 100 flowers bloom...It's a signal - speak your voice, be heard.
    - Lee Hsien Loong, National Day Rally, 2004


    "I know some people want even greater freedom. But where politics is concerned, I prefer to ease up slowly rather than open up with a big bang. When Gorbachev opened up the Soviet Union with his glasnost, the Soviet Union collapsed with a big bang. We should, therefore, pump the air into the political balloon slowly. I don't intend to change my name to 'Goh Ba Chov'!"
    - Goh Chok Tong, 2001 National Day Rally


    "I am encouraged also because I see more and more people write letters to the press and sign their real names. That's a good sign, a good tendency. To run a democratic system, you must have democratic impulses in the people. There must be a cultural basis for that system. It's not just having a constitution and saying," Well, there you are, the system is democratic."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, 1990 National Day Rally


    "Now if democracy will not work for the Russians, a white Christian people, can we assume that it will naturally work with Asians?"
    - Lee Kuan Yew, Asahai Shimbun symposium, May 9, 1991


    "Our people should feel free to express diverse views, pursue unconventional ideas or simply be different."
    - Lee Hsien Loong, Inauguration Speech, Aug 12 2004


    "They say people can think for themselves? Do you honestly believe that the chap who can't pass primary six knows the consequence of his choice when he answers a question viscerally, on language, culture and religion? But we knew the consequences. We would starve, we would have race riots. We would disintegrate."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, The Man & His Ideas, 1997


    "They say, oh, let’s have multiparty politics. Let’s have different parties change and be in charge of the Government. Is it that simple? You vote in a Division Three government, not a Division One government, and the whole economy will just subside within three, four years. Finished."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, Today, Aug 15 2008



    On JUSTICE

    "If it is not totalitarian to arrest a man and detain him, when you cannot charge him with any offence against any written law - if that is not what we have always cried out against in Fascist states - then what is it?"
    - Opposition leader Lee Kuan Yew, Legislative Assembly Debates, Sept 21, 1955


    "These powers will not be allowed to be used against political opponents within the system who compete for the right to work the system. That is fundamental and basic or the powers will have destroyed the purpose for which they were forged."
    - Lee Kuan Yew speaking in Parliament on the Preservation of Public Security Act, a precursor to the ISA, Oct 14, 1959


    "We have over a hundred political detainees, men against whom we are unable to prove anything in a court of law. Nearly 50 of them are men who gave us a great deal of anxiety during the years of Confrontation because they were Malay extremists. Your life and this dinner would not be what it is if my colleagues and I had decided to play it according to the rules of the game."
    - Lee Kuan Yew speaking to the Singapore Advocates and Solicitors Society, Mar 18, 1967


    "We have to lock up people, without trial, whether they are communists, whether they are language chauvinists, whether they are religious extremists. If you don't do that, the country would be in ruins."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, 1986


    "The same law applies to me. Nobody has sued me for libel because I do not defame my enemies."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, Success Stories, 2002


    "Most libels, and I have taken about 30 actions, take place at election time. It has not stuck because I am prepared to go before a court, stand in the witness box and face the most aggressive of lawyers who can cross-examine me on my personal history."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, Straits Times, Sept 30 2002



    On EQUALITY

    "The way to build a cohesive society is to ensure that every Singaporean is treated equally, and that the rich and powerful are not favoured over ordinary Singaporeans, Mr Goh Chok Tong emphasised last night."
    - Straits Times, Aug 12 1991


    It is essential to rear a generation at the very top of society that has all the qualities needed to lead and give the people the inspiration and the drive to make it succeed. In short, the elite.. Every society tries to produce this type. The British have special schools for them: the gifted and talented are sent to Eton and Harrow."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, August 1966


    "If I tell Singaporeans - we are all equal regardless of race, language, religion, culture. Then they will say,"Look, I'm doing poorly. You are responsible." But I can show that from British times, certain groups have always done poorly, in mathematics and in science. But I'm not God, I can't change you. But I can encourage you, give you extra help to make you do, say maybe, 20% better."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, Success Stories, 2002


    "The human being is an unequal creature. That is a fact. And we start off with the proposition. All the great religions, all the great movements, all the great political ideology, say let us make the human being as equal as possible. In fact, he is not equal, never will be."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, from a speech during the 1960s, Success Stories


    "We must encourage those who earn less than $200 per month and cannot afford to nurture and educate many children never to have more than two... We will regret the time lost if we do not now take the first tentative steps towards correcting a trend which can leave our society with a large number of the physically, intellectually and culturally anaemic."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, 1967


    "There are some flaws in the assumptions made for democracy. It is assumed that all men and women are equal or should be equal. Hence, one-man-one-vote. But is equality realistic? If it is not, to insist on equality must lead to regression."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, Create 21 Asahi Forum Tokyo, Nov 20 1992


    On PEACE

    "Repression can only go up to a point. When it becomes too acute, the instruments of repression, namely the army and the police, have been proved time and time again in history to have turned their guns on their masters."
    - Opposition leader Lee Kuan Yew, Straits Times, May 5, 1959


    "If I have to shoot 200,000 students to save China from another 100 years of disorder, so be it." - Lee Kuan Yew evoking the ghost of Deng Xiaoping whilst endorsing the Tiananmen Square massacre, Straits Times, Aug 17, 2004


    "Without the elected president and if there is a freak result, within two or three years, the army would have to come in and stop it"
    - Lee Kuan Yew on what would happen if a profligate opposition government touched Singapore's vast monetary reserves, Straits Times, Sept 16 2006



    On PROGRESS

    "I am often accused of interfering in the private lives of citizens. Yes, if I did not, had I not done that, we wouldn't be here today. And I say without the slightest remorse, that we wouldn't be here, we would not have made economic progress, if we had not intervene on very personal matters - who your neighbour is, how you live, the noise you make, how you spit, or what language you use. We decide what is right. Never mind what people think."
    - Lee Kuan Yew, Straits Times, Apr 20 1987


    "Every Singaporean who owns a flat can double his value in today's terms within the next 15 to 20 years. In other words, in the next 20 years, we can make everybody worth twice as much, at least."
    - PM Lee Kuan Yew, National Day Rally, 1990


    "We've got to compete ourselves from now on with developed countries, not with developing countries, because we are going to compete in the developed country league."
    - Goh Chok Tong, 1992 National Day Rally


    "Earning money is not the sole objective of life or education. A community of any quality should have a whole range of skills and interests. They should paint, write, perform, visit art galleries and enjoy world-class concerts. Only then will they form a vibrant, rounded, interesting community."
    - Goh Chok Tong, 1999 National Day Rally


    "In the next decade, we need to think and act like revolutionaries. We have to innovate, not merely imitate. We will succeed not be following the footsteps of the incumbent, but by introducing new dimensions into play. We need Singaporeans who can lead the way in creating new wealth for our economy."
    - Goh Chok Tong, 2000 National Day Rally


    "New Singapore will be one of the world's finest, most liveable cities. Arts, theatres, museums, music and sports will flourish. Singapore will be a lively and exciting place.. Our city will not only have depth, but also the richness of diversity. But above all, Singapore will a home for Singaporeans."
    - Goh Chok Tong, 2001 National Day Rally